After it already this morning to intense discussions about the "runner-case" was, here are some hints to rework:
BGHSt 11, 268 (The Federal Court murder trial in 1958 in complicity yes)
Prof. Scheffler's Case Notes from the JuS 1992
The a urrent essay on the topic from the ZJS 2008 of Dehne-Niemann
Further reading Notes:
to agency and part name I recommend the Read the textbook by Krey, AT II you there through the entire chapter! It is worth it because Krey argues, not only foreign bloodless reproduce.
interested For more:
Sch / Sch / Cramer / Heine , prep. § § 25 ff para 16 et seq (penalties because of the participation) para 51-97 (defining agency and participation)
§ 25 para 61-101 (complicity)
to experiment with complicity to § 22 para 55, to rescind § 24 para 85ff. (Preventing a mere omission by not further action, as in our case: para 89) (Everything Schönke / Schröder, StGB comment, 26th edition)
from the standard work for the agency and participation:
Roxin, agency and control over the infringement, 8 . Ed p.275 ff particular page 278, down / 279 up to the key role of the accomplice, p. 286 ff to error and excess, p. 292-305 for the dispute over the participation only in the preparatory stage.
0 comments:
Post a Comment